Home > Shop By Grade > Highschool (14+) > Thinking Skills >

  James Madison Critical Thinking Course
James Madison Critical Thinking Course


 
More Views:


Our Price: $39.99
You'll earn 40 Doodle Dollar points
Ages: 12+
Grade Levels: 8-12+

Availability: Usually Ships in 24 to 48 Hours
Product Code: 410-401

Timberdoodle's review
 
Download sample pages from James Madison Critical Thinking Course (PDF)

Captivating Scenarios, Exceptional Critical Thinking
Engage your teen in captivating crime-related scenarios and give him the exceptional critical thinking skills he needs with the James Madison Critical Thinking Course. Superbly easy for any homeschool family to use, the step-by-step, self-instructional lessons and activities are straightforward and applicable across your teenís entire curriculum.

Learn Analytical Skills by Solving Mysteries
Using mini-mysteries and a fictional detective with the Los Angeles Police Department, each chapter of the James Madison Critical Thinking Course focuses on various thinking skills and leads your teen gradually into complicated analytical skills. Massive in scope, the course teaches more than sixty-five skills and concepts related to critical thinking, such as learning how to distinguish a fact from an opinion, recognizing ambiguity in a statement, evaluating arguments as valid or not, and assessing common fallacies in reasoning.

Includes Everything Covered in a Typical Logic Course
Everything in a typical introductory logic course is included in the James Madison Critical Thinking Course. Pages are perforated for easy removal and are reproducible for your home use. The Instruction Guide (sold separately) provides answers to both the exercises and the quizzes, but virtually no additional information.

Another outstanding component of Timberdoodle's 2016 Eleventh-Grade Curriculum Kit!
Features
  • Interpret and apply complex texts, instructions, illustrations, etc.
  • Recognize and clarify issues, claims, arguments, and explanations.
  • Distinguish: conclusions, premises (reasons), arguments, explanations, assumptions (stated/unstated), issues, claims (statements), suppositions, unstated conclusions, unstated premises, and implications.
  • Recognize ambiguity and unclearness in claims, arguments, and explanations.
  • Distinguish necessary and sufficient conditions.
  • Describe the structure or outline of arguments and explanations: confirmation, disconfirmation.
  • Evaluate whether an inductive argument is strong or weak.
  • Evaluate claims and arguments in terms of criteria such as: consistency, relevance, support.
  • Evaluate analogical arguments and inductive generalization arguments in terms of criteria, such as: the greater the number of similarities between the conclusion and the premises regarding the sample, the stronger the argument.
  • Assess the relevance of claims to other claims, and to questions, descriptions, representations, procedures, information, directives, rules, principles, etc.
  • Evaluate whether a deductive argument is valid or invalid (logical form): categorical, truth-functional, and semantic/definitional.
  • Distinguish supporting, conflicting, compatible, and equivalent claims, arguments, explanations, descriptions, representations, etc.
  • Identify and avoid errors in reasoning, informal fallacies: begging the question, equivocation, post hoc, ergo propter hoc (after that, therefore, because of that), false dilemma/false dichotomy fallacy (line drawing fallacy, perfectionist fallacy), smoke screen/red herring/rationalizing, hasty generalization, appeal to ridicule/sarcasm, ad hominem fallacy (personal attack, poisoning the well), appeal to illegitimate authority, loaded question, evidence surrogate, stereotyping, appeal to consequences (favorable or unfavorable), "wishful thinking", genetic fallacy, biased generalization, anecdotal evidence.
  • Discern whether pairs of claims are consistent, contrary, contradictory, or paradoxical.
Publisher's Information
Authors: William O'Meara, Ph.D and Daniel Flage, Ph.D
Pages:
544, perforated
Activities: Sixty-five critical thinking related skills and concepts
Black & White:
Yes
Binding: Paperback
Copyright:
2011
ISBN:
9781601441454
Publisher:
The Critical Thinking Co
Printed In:
USA
Faith-Based: No

Awards and Endorsements:
Cathy Duffy - 101 Top Picks for Homeschool Curriculum

Related Products...
You Decide! James Madison Critical Thinking Course Teacher Guide Building Thinking Skills Book 3 Verbal
Our Price: $26.99

Add
Our Price: $10.99

Add
Our Price: $29.99

Add
You Decide! James Madison Critical Thinking Course Teacher Guide Building Thinking Skills Book 3 Verbal

Average Customer Review: 4.5 of 5 Total Reviews: 3 Write a review.

  0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
 
Good Book for Practicing Logic October 11, 2013
Reviewer: Joyce M.  
This is a really good book for actually putting logic into practice through criminal investigation. I would have liked some more introductory help for me as the teacher, but overall, a really good "working" textbook!

Was this review helpful to you?

  0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
 
Will use with all of my children January 14, 2013
Reviewer: Lisa  
When I handed The James Madison Critical Thinking Course to my 11th grader, he groaned (loudly). He hadn't worked through a critical thinking course and I thought this seemed to be the most interesting option. I honestly can't say that it's his favorite subject, but he does it without complaint. He works through the lessons on his own and I find the grading to be a snap. When I asked for his critique he said that he likes the fact that the lessons can be completed in a short amount of time. He also mentioned that the lessons can get a bit repetitive, but I see this as a definate plus by helping to solidify the concepts. Overall, I'm very pleased with the scope of skills covered and will be using this with my younger children.

Was this review helpful to you?

  0 of 0 people found the following review helpful:
 
Great Critical Thinking Course January 14, 2013
Reviewer: Sheila  
This critical thinking course is highly interesting. Court cases are reviewed by the student as they attempt to determine logical answers to questions asked. My students only complaint is that the answer key does not tell the outcome of the trial. A small flaw in an otherwise great program.

Was this review helpful to you?